What Is a Walkover in Tennis? Rules and Famous Examples
You are at a Grand Slam, the crowd is settled, and the players walk onto the court. Except one never shows up. The umpire makes an announcement, the lucky-loser scramble begins backstage, and the opponent is through to the next round without hitting a single ball. So what is a walkover in tennis? Simply put, it is when a player advances because their opponent withdraws before the match starts — for injury, illness, or another legitimate reason. No rallies, no score, just a notation on the draw sheet that changes everything about how that tournament unfolds.
I have followed draws long enough to know that walkovers are some of the most misunderstood moments in the sport. They look like free wins on paper, but the rules around them — who replaces the withdrawing player, whether the winner gets full prize money, how it affects the rankings — are precise, and they are very different from a retirement. Let’s break it all down.
What Is a Walkover in Tennis, Exactly?
A walkover (usually abbreviated “w/o”) is recorded when a match cannot be played because one player withdraws before the match begins. The opponent automatically advances to the next round. Under ATP and WTA rules, a walkover can only be claimed if the withdrawing player is genuinely unable to compete — a medical withdrawal, a personal emergency, or a rule violation such as a late arrival that exceeds the allowed grace period.
The key timing distinction is everything in tennis:
- Before the first point: withdrawal = walkover. The match never existed.
- After the first point: withdrawal = retirement. The match counts, and the score stands as it was.
That single dividing line creates very different consequences. In a retirement, the player who stays in the match officially wins it — the result goes into the record books with the score frozen at whatever it was. In a walkover, there is no score at all. The winner’s name simply moves forward on the bracket, and the tournament’s official draw marks the match as unplayed.
Walkover vs. Retirement: Why the Difference Matters
Fans use these terms interchangeably, but the rulebook does not, and the difference ripples into rankings, prize money, and even betting markets.
Rankings points. When you win by walkover, you still earn the ranking points for that round — points are awarded for reaching a round, not for how you got there. The withdrawing player, meanwhile, keeps the points from the last round they actually completed. This is why you sometimes see players hobble through a first-round match and then withdraw before the second: they protect their first-round points and let their body recover, rather than retiring mid-match.
Prize money. Grand Slams and most tour events award full round prize money to a player who advances by walkover. The logic is straightforward: the player showed up ready to play, and their opponent’s absence is not their problem. The withdrawing player receives the prize money for the last round they completed — but there is an important caveat. At the Grand Slams, players who withdraw after the draw has been made but before their first match may have their first-round prize money withheld or redirected to a lucky loser, a policy designed to stop clearly injured players from taking a paycheck without competing.
The replacement. When a player withdraws before the match, the tournament fills the slot with a “lucky loser” — a player who lost in the final round of qualifying but gets the spot. This is why withdrawals announced early enough are actually good news for someone waiting in the wings. A withdrawal that comes after play has started in a round can’t be replaced; the opponent simply advances. You can learn more about how matches are officially scored and recorded — how matches are officially scored and recorded, which is what determines where that line sits.
Famous Walkover Examples at Grand Slams
Walkovers have quietly shaped some of the biggest tournaments in tennis history.
One of the most talked-about cases came at Wimbledon, where withdrawal rules became a genuine controversy. Several high-profile players withdrew with injuries after the draw, collected first-round prize money, and never struck a ball. The fallout was so visible that Wimbledon and the Grand Slam Board tightened the rules, introducing fines and prize-money deductions for players who were clearly unfit before the tournament even began. It was a rare moment where an administrative term — “walkover” — became a headline.
Walkovers also routinely decide the tail end of tournaments. Late-round walkovers in semifinals have handed players an extra day of rest before a final — an enormous advantage in a sport where recovery is everything. Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer have all benefited from walkovers at various points in their careers, advancing without expending a drop of energy while their eventual final opponent battled through five sets. There is no asterisk in the record books for it; tennis treats rest as part of the game.
Then there are the heartbreak versions: players who qualified brilliantly, got their dream first-round draw against a top seed, and watched it evaporate when that seed withdrew the morning of the match. The lucky loser who replaces them is usually the one who lost in qualifying — suddenly back in the main draw with nothing to lose. Some lucky losers have run to the second week off that kind of reprieve.
Why Do Walkovers Happen?
The reasons are almost always medical. Tennis is a brutal sport on the body: stress fractures, torn muscles, twisted ankles, stomach illnesses picked up while traveling. The schedule is relentless, and players frequently arrive at tournaments carrying injuries they hope will hold together. When they don’t, the player calls the tournament office, submits a medical note, and the walkover is recorded.
Less common causes include:
- Personal emergencies: family crises that pull a player off tour mid-event.
- Rule violations: failing to arrive on court within the permitted time after being called.
- Scheduling conflicts: extremely rare at the top level, but possible in doubles or lower-tier events.
- Strategic withdrawals: a player may withdraw before a match to protect ranking points or preserve themselves for a more important event — legal, but heavily frowned upon.
Common Misconceptions About Walkovers
“A walkover is a free win.” Not quite. The advancing player misses match practice on that surface, loses rhythm, and often faces a better-rested opponent in the next round — a genuine concern in best-of-five matches.
“The winner didn’t deserve the points.” The ranking system doesn’t care how you reached a round. Points reflect position in the tournament, and the withdrawing player accepted that consequence when they pulled out.
“Walkovers are bad for fans.” They can be, which is why tournaments now try to fill withdrawn slots with lucky losers so the ticket holder still sees a real match. The modern system is designed around the fan in the seat.

How Walkovers Affect Betting and Fantasy Tennis
If you ever dabble in tennis betting, this matters: sportsbooks treat walkovers differently from retirements. Most books void bets on matches that end in a walkover — since no ball was struck, there is no official result to settle. Retirements are usually settled according to each book’s house rules, often after one full set has been completed. Always check your sportsbook’s tennis rules before placing a wager; they publish them explicitly because walkovers happen constantly.
Walkovers in Doubles and Team Competitions
The walkover rule works a little differently outside singles. In doubles, if one player of a team withdraws, the team can sometimes substitute — but at the tour level, a doubles walkover usually means the whole team is out, and their opponents advance. Mixed doubles at the Slams follows the same principle.
Team events like the Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup handle it through tie structure: if a player can’t contest a scheduled rubber, it’s recorded as a walkover win for the opposing team in that rubber. The tie continues with the remaining matches. This has decided ties before — a team losing its top singles player to injury mid-weekend can watch two rubbers evaporate without a ball being hit.
FAQ
Does a walkover count as a win on a player’s record?
Not as a match played — there is no scoreline and it doesn’t add to a player’s win total in the traditional sense. However, the player is credited with reaching the next round for points and prize money purposes.
Can a player withdraw and re-enter the same tournament?
No. Once a player withdraws from a singles or doubles event, they are out of that event for good. They may still compete in a different event at the same tournament (singles vs. doubles), unless the withdrawal was for medical reasons that the tournament’s medical team judges to be ongoing.
What is a lucky loser?
A lucky loser is a player who lost in the final qualifying round but enters the main draw because someone withdrew before their first match. Lucky losers are typically drawn by lot from the pool of highest-ranked final-round qualifying losers.
Do players get fined for late withdrawals?
They can be. The Grand Slams and the tours have rules penalizing withdrawals made after certain deadlines, especially when a player was clearly unfit before the draw was made. Fines and forfeited prize money are the enforcement tools.
Is a walkover the same as a default?
No. A default is when a player is removed from a match by the umpire for a code violation or misconduct — for example, being disqualified. A walkover is a voluntary withdrawal before the match begins.
Has anyone ever won a Grand Slam benefiting from a walkover?
Players have won Slams after receiving walkovers in earlier rounds — extra rest late in a two-week tournament is a real advantage. No champion has received walkovers in every round, but several have had their path made easier by them.

The next time you see “w/o” on a draw sheet, don’t skip past it. That little notation can mean an injury, a lucky loser’s career moment, or the extra rest day that decides a final. In tennis, the matches that never happen sometimes matter as much as the ones that do.









